Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1910 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-4100 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74954 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |