Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 2429 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 11% better in Valorant than Core i3-4160T - 808 vs 727 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 35 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7443P doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7443P
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Milan | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 200 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
