Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 2380 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 11% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 148 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 48 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 120 vs 200 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7443P
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Milan | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
24 | Cores | 12 |
48 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
