Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Core i5-5257U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 2206 days newer than Core i5-5257U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-5257U - 135 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5257U - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5257U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 28 vs 200 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7443P doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
EPYC 7443P
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i5-5257U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Core i5-5257U |
|---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Milan | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | 28 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris 6100 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
