Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2543 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Celeron G1620 - 82 vs 76 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 50% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $49.0 vs $98.79
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
42.73772204806687%
Multi-Core
723
36.60759493670886%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |