Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 61% better in League of Legends than Celeron G3900 - 108 vs 67 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |