Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 811 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |