Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 200GE outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1956 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than FX-6350 - 250 vs 235 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-6350 - $69.99 vs $100.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-6350 - $0.28 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
250
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |