Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1693 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 130 vs 122 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
