Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 2308 days newer than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 39% better in Battlefield V than Radeon R7 250E - 110 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 50 vs 55 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 4 vs 1 GB
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
