Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 380 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 1763 days newer than Radeon R9 380.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Radeon R9 380 - 148 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 50 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 380 - 4 vs 2 GB
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
89%
Radeon R9 380
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
108.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
