Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 285 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 2052 days newer than Radeon R9 285.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 9% better in Resident Evil Village than Radeon R9 285 - 87 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 50 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 4 vs 2 GB
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
94%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
