Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 2234 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 5 than Radeon R9 280 - 109 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 50 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
92%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
