Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1952 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 127 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €157.00 vs €409.14
- Up to 67% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.24 vs €3.75 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
109
86%
Value, €/FPS
€3.75/FPS
33%
Price, €
€409.14
38%
Buy for €409.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |