Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1853 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 220 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €367.85 vs €409.14
- Up to 26% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €1.67 vs €2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
82%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
74%
Price, €
€409.14
89%
Buy for €409.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€367.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €367.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |