Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €384.47 vs €419.99
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 204 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €2.06 vs €2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
83%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
91%
Price, €
€384.47
100%
Buy for €384.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7375 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€419.99
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7649 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |