Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1162 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 195% better in Cities: Skylines II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 56 vs 19 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €245.00 vs €384.47
- Up to 78% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €4.38 vs €20.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
19
34%
Value, €/FPS
€20.24/FPS
22%
Price, €
€384.47
63%
Buy for €384.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7373 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€245
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €245 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7647 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |