Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €384.47 vs €485.00
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 37% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 917 vs 671 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.53 vs €0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 32 vs 16 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
671
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
93%
Price, €
€384.47
100%
Buy for €384.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7381 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
917
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€485
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7655 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |