Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 712 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900K.
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €434.79 vs €485.00
- Up to 2% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-14900KF - €1.67 vs €1.70 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900K - 285 vs 261 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
261
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€434.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €434.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900K | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |