Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1526 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 470 vs 403 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €348.90 vs €409.14
- Up to 27% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.74 vs €1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
403
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
73%
Price, €
€409.14
85%
Buy for €409.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
470
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€348.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €348.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |