Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 426 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - €157.00 vs €170.49
- Up to 4% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12600KF - €0.23 vs €0.24 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - 697 vs 672 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
697
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
96%
Price, €
€170.49
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |