Buy on Amazon
€63.66
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 70 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3930 - 239 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 51 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
51.744680851063826%
Multi-Core
1043
10.843122985757356%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
