Buy on Amazon
€108.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1422 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 26% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 44 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 55 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
174
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 318 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
