Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1121 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil Village than Athlon 3000G - 298 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
296
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
145 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |