Buy on Amazon
€359
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8300 - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €80.56 vs €359.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10900 - €0.38 vs €1.63 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
23.312883435582823%
Price, €
€359
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 processor 2.8 GHz 20 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
211
95.9090909090909%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.56
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
