Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Sons Of The Forest than Athlon 3000G - 105 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €81.31 vs €436.89
- Up to 80% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i9-10900 - €0.84 vs €4.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.16/FPS
20%
Price, €
€436.89
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
97
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |