Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €74.94 vs €540.94
- Up to 85% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900 - €0.48 vs €3.22 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.22/FPS
14%
Price, €
€540.94
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €540.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
155
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |