Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8300 - 202 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - €80.56 vs €232.02
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-11700 - €0.48 vs €1.15 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
41%
Price, €
€232.02
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €232.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |