Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 34% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1610 - 205 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - €88.88 vs €233.01
- Up to 49% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-11700 - €0.58 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
50%
Price, €
€233.01
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €233.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |