Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €88.88 vs €354.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.53 vs €1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1610 - 216 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
167
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Buy for €354 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |