Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - €72.66 vs €322.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 7900X - €0.44 vs €1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1610 - 203 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
166
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11465 minutes ago
Buy for €322 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |