Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €72.66 vs €312.86
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75095 minutes ago
Buy for €312.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
24.163357912648895%
Multi-Core
739
8.072973563469521%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |