Buy on Amazon
€349.57
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-8600K - 603 vs 576 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €222.78 vs €349.57
- Up to 33% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900KF - €0.39 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
603
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
67%
Price, €
€349.57
63%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10900KF, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 10 core fino a 5,3 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €349.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
576
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€222.78
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-8600K, 3.6 GHZ, 9MB Cache, LGA 1151
Buy for €222.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-8600K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
