Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - €72.66 vs €402.29
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1610 - 138 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 346 minutes ago
Buy for €402.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
14.319327731092438%
Multi-Core
739
3.842154518040969%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |