Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $739
Availability
MSRP in USD: $739
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €72.66 vs €392.87
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 47% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1610 - 157 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-12900KS procesador 30 MB Smart Cache Caja
Buy for €392.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.824665676077265%
Multi-Core
739
4.555261049127782%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
