Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €72.66 vs €500.4
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610 - 809 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for €500.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
14.324142568930734%
Multi-Core
739
3.66785785189597%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |