Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than Core i7-9700F - 85 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €311.39 vs €468.73
- Up to 7% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-13900K - €5.1 vs €5.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.51/FPS
92%
Price, €
€468.73
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €468.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
61
71%
Value, €/FPS
€5.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €311.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |