Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1666 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €72.66 vs €615.6
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 473 minutes ago
Buy for €615.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
30.191353649893692%
Multi-Core
739
9.415212128933623%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |