Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2026 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €683.87 vs €723.64
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-7820X - 151 vs 135 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-7820X - €4.79 vs €5.07 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €683.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€723.64
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €723.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |