Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 694 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1610 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €49.97 vs €72.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Intel Core i5 2nd generation Intel® Core(TM) i5-2500K Processor (6M Cache, 3.30 GHz)
Buy for €49.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
65.94427244582043%
Multi-Core
739
38.469547110879745%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
