Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 941 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 31% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G1610 - 77 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €88.88 vs €188.88
- Up to 38% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-6600K - €1.51 vs €2.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 55 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
59
76%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |