Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €188.88 vs €211.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13400F - €1.25 vs €1.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i5-6600K - 160 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
151
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17345 minutes ago
Buy for €211 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |