Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2773 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €88.88 vs €424.03
- Up to 4% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €1.81 vs €1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 359% better in League of Legends than Celeron G1610 - 225 vs 49 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
49
21%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 718 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.88/FPS
96%
Price, €
€424.03
20%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT Processore senza dispositivo di raffreddamento, 8 Core 3.9 GHz Socket AM4 Boxato
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 719 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
