Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - €72.66 vs €321.81
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 166 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 937 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-8700T prcsr Tray Processori (fino a 4.00 GHz), 2.40 2400, 14 nm, 12 MB, 4.00 4000, DMI3, Coffee Lake)
Buy for €321.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
32.22390317700454%
Multi-Core
739
15.753570667235131%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
