Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1590 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 156 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €74.94 vs €88.88
- Up to 20% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - €0.48 vs €0.6 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15398 minutes ago
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |