Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 315 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €74.94 vs €188.88
- Up to 60% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-6900K - €0.76 vs €1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen 5 1600 - 100 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
98
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15220 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
40%
Price, €
€188.88
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |