Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - 287 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than FX-8300 - €74.94 vs €80.56
- Up to 10% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - €0.26 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15735 minutes ago
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |