Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 688 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 6% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 150 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €84.44 vs €188.88
- Up to 53% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-6900K - €0.59 vs €1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
46%
Price, €
€188.88
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
142
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |