Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200U is 1903 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than FX-8300 - 48 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |