Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 925 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 2892 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - €25.22 vs €74.44
- Up to 59% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 1600X - €0.17 vs €0.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 23% better in Rust than Phenom II X4 925 - 183 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
149
81.4207650273224%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
41.463414634146346%
Price, €
€74.44
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
28.495102404274263%
Multi-Core
930
19.5132186319765%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |